Whether you're a board member, a property manager, or part of a self-managed building, the reserve fund affects everyone connected to a condo corporation. Here's how to tell whether an Ontario corporation's fund is actually healthy — and what the law requires.

What a reserve fund is — and what the Ontario Act requires

A reserve fund is a pool of money a condo corporation is legally required to maintain specifically for the major repair and replacement of common elements and assets — roofs, elevators, parking structures, HVAC, windows — not day-to-day maintenance or operating costs. Under the Ontario Condominium Act, 1998, every corporation faces four core obligations:

  • Establish and maintain a reserve fund (s. 93(2)). There is no size threshold and no exemption.
  • Conduct a reserve fund study within one year of registration, and update it periodically after that.
  • Propose a funding plan within 120 days of receiving a study (s. 94(8)). That clock starts the moment the study is delivered.
  • Until the first study is complete, contribute at least 10% of budgeted common expenses to the reserve.

How to measure reserve fund health

Three things tell you whether a fund is in good shape:

  • Percent funded — the current balance divided by the fully funded balance the study says it should hold at this point in time. As a general rule of thumb, around 80% or higher is considered healthy, while below roughly 70% is a warning sign. Treat these as approximate benchmarks, not hard cutoffs.
  • 30-year funding trajectory — the study includes a 30-year projection. The key question is whether the fund stays positive for the full 30 years. A dip toward zero, especially in years 15 to 25 when major replacements cluster, is a problem.
  • Contribution adequacy — under s. 93(6), contributions must be set at a level reasonably expected to fund major repairs based on expected costs and asset lifespans. The legal standard is grounded in the study, not 'whatever the board voted on last year.'

A six-question checklist

Anyone responsible for a corporation's finances should be able to answer these:

  1. Is the reserve fund study current? In Ontario, studies should be updated at least every three years — sooner after major repairs or renovations.
  2. Is the fund balance adequate relative to the study's recommended threshold?
  3. Are annual contributions keeping pace with the study's funding plan? Boards commonly set contributions below the recommendation, and that gap compounds.
  4. Have there been large unplanned expenditures that drew down the fund?
  5. Is the corporation aware of aging components nearing end of life? Buildings hitting 25 or 30 years often face a cluster of major replacements.
  6. Are contributions structured fairly, based on unit factors or an approved alternative?

A healthy fund, when all six are in order: study updated within three years, balance at or above threshold, no repeated special assessments, contributions rising with inflation, and a 30-year plan with no deficit.

Red flags to watch for

  • An underfunded reserve — roughly below 70% funded — usually from inadequate contributions in the early years that the corporation has been chasing ever since.
  • A flat or declining 30-year balance — if the projection levels off or heads down before the 30-year window is out, a special assessment is a question of when, not if.
  • An aging building with an old study — a study done at 20 years is a very different picture from what's needed at 30. Over three years old in a building 25+ deserves scrutiny.
  • Overdue study updates — skipping the periodic updates required under s. 94 is a governance and compliance problem, not just a planning gap.
  • Repeated special assessments — two or three over a decade is a pattern that signals the reserve hasn't been funded adequately.
  • No funding plan after a study — sitting past the 120-day review window under s. 94(8) isn't neutral; it's non-compliance.

Proactive oversight is the job

Good practice looks the same whether you're a manager, a board member or self-managed: track study renewal dates proactively so the three-year mark isn't a fire drill; make reserve fund status a standing agenda item in board meetings, annual reports and AGMs; flag the 120-day review obligation the moment a study arrives; and justify the contribution against what the study recommends at budget time, rather than rolling over last year's number with a standard bump.

From static reports to dynamic planning

The traditional study is a PDF — a snapshot of one moment that gets filed and forgotten. myRPlanner (powered by StelorPM) transforms that study data into a live planning tool the board and management can access any time: the 30-year forecast updates against actual contributions, and you can model scenarios — raise contributions 5%, pull the roof replacement forward two years — and see the financial impact before deciding. For self-managed buildings it brings the same quality of oversight larger managed buildings have, without needing a dedicated analyst.

Five takeaways

  1. Reserve funds are a legal obligation, not optional — the Act applies to every corporation regardless of size, age, or management model.
  2. Health is measurable: percent funded, 30-year trajectory, and contribution adequacy.
  3. Red flags compound — underfunding accelerates, and the longer it goes unaddressed the harder the options become.
  4. Proactive oversight is the job — the reserve fund is not set-and-forget, and someone needs to own it.
  5. Better tools make it manageable — information that used to live in a static PDF can be dynamic, accessible and actionable.

Need help with your reserve fund?

Get a fast, fair quote from Reserve Plus.

Request a quote